Week 8: Summative Assignment: Critique of Research Article<\/p>\n
The body of your paper should be 4\u20136 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page. The critique must be attached to the article and follow Ace homework tutors – APA guidelines. PLEASE USE ARTICLES UPLOADED<\/p>\n
A research critique demonstrates your ability to critically read an investigative study. For this assignment, choose a research article related to nursing.<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Articles used for this assignment cannot be used for the other assignments (students should find new research articles for each new assignment).<\/p>\n
\u00b7 The selected articles should be original research articles. Review articles, concept analysis, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, integrative review, and systemic review should not be used.<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Mixed-methods studies should not be used.<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Dissertations should not be used.<\/p>\n
Your critique should include the following:<\/p>\n
Research Problem\/Purpose<\/p>\n
\u00b7 State the problem clearly as it is presented in the report.<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Have the investigators placed the study problem within the context of existing knowledge?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Will the study solve a problem relevant to nursing?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 State the purpose of the research.<\/p>\n
Review of the Literature<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Identify the concepts explored in the literature review.<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Were the references current? If not, what do you think the reasons are?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Was there evidence of reflexivity in the design (qualitative)?<\/p>\n
Theoretical Framework<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Are the theoretical concepts defined and related to the research?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Does the research draw solely on nursing theory or does it draw on theory from other disciplines?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Is a theoretical framework stated in this research piece?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 If not, suggest one that might be suitable for the study.<\/p>\n
Variables\/Hypotheses\/Questions\/Assumptions (Quantitative)<\/p>\n
\u00b7 What are the independent and dependent variables in this study?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Are the operational definitions of the variables given? If so, are they concrete and measurable?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Is the research question or the hypothesis stated? What is it?<\/p>\n
Conceptual Underpinnings, Research Questions (Qualitative)<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Are key concepts defined conceptually?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Is the philoosoophical basis, underlying tradition, conoceptual framework, or ideological orientation made explicit and is it appropriate for the problem?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Are research questions explicitly stated? Are the questions consistent with the study’s philosophical basis, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideological orientation?<\/p>\n
Methodology<\/p>\n
\u00b7 What type of design (quantitative, qualitative, and type) was used in this study?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Was inductive or deductive reasoning used in this study?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 State the sample size and study population, sampling method, and study setting.<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Did the investigator choose a probability or non-probability sample?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 State the type of reliability and the validity of the measurement tools (quantitative only)<\/p>\n
Qualitative studies (answer the following questions in addition to those above except the last bulleted item)<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Were the methods of gathering data appropriate?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Did the researcher ask the right questions or make the right observations and were they recorded in an appropriate fashion?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Was a sufficient amount of data gathered?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Was the data of sufficient depth and richness?<\/p>\n
Were ethical considerations addressed? Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants?<\/p>\n
Data Analysis<\/p>\n
\u00b7 What data analysis tool was used?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Was saturation achieved? (qualitative)<\/p>\n
\u00b7 How were the results presented in the study?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Were the data management (e.g., coding) and data analysis methods sufficiently described? (qualitative)<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Identify at least one (1) finding.<\/p>\n
Homework help – Summary\/Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Do the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Did the analysis yield an insightful, provocative and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Were methods used to enhance the trustworthiness of the data (and analysis) and was the description of those methods adequate?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Are there clear explanation of the boundaries\/limitations, thick description, audit trail?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 What are the strengths and limitations of the study?<\/p>\n
\u00b7 In terms of the findings, can the researcher generalize to other populations? Explain.<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Evaluate the findings and conclusions as to their significance for nursing (both qualitative and quantitative).<\/p>\n
The body of your paper should be 4\u20136 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page. The critique must be attached to the article and follow Ace homework tutors – APA guidelines.<\/p>\n
Need Ace homework tutors – APA Help?<\/p>\n
You must submit the research study articles along with your assignment.<\/p>\n
Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.<\/p>\n
Rubric<\/p>\n
NURS_350_OL – NURS350-Research Critique<\/p>\n
NURS_350_OL – NURS350-Research Critique<\/p>\n
Criteria<\/p>\n
Ratings<\/p>\n
Pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Problem\/Purpose<\/p>\n
28 to >24.92 pts<\/p>\n
Meets or Exceeds Expectations<\/p>\n
Research problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are clearly identified.<\/p>\n
24.92 to >21.0 pts<\/p>\n
Mostly Meets Expectations<\/p>\n
Research problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are somewhat identified.<\/p>\n
21 to >16.52 pts<\/p>\n
Below Expectations<\/p>\n
Research problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are mostly absent or misidentified.<\/p>\n
16.52 to >0 pts<\/p>\n
Does Not Meet Expectations<\/p>\n
Research problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are absent.<\/p>\n
28 pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReview of the Literature<\/p>\n
42 to >37.38 pts<\/p>\n
Meets or Exceeds Expectations<\/p>\n
Concepts explored in the literature review are clearly identified. Critique of the references is included and well developed.<\/p>\n
37.38 to >31.5 pts<\/p>\n
Mostly Meets Expectations<\/p>\n
Concepts explored in the literature review are somewhat identified. Critique of the references is included, but may not be fully developed.<\/p>\n
31.5 to >24.78 pts<\/p>\n
Below Expectations<\/p>\n
Concepts explored in the literature review are misidentified. Critique of the references is severely lacking.<\/p>\n
24.78 to >0 pts<\/p>\n
Does Not Meet Expectations<\/p>\n
Concepts explored in the literature review are absent. Critique of the references is absent.<\/p>\n
42 pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Framework<\/p>\n
28 to >24.92 pts<\/p>\n
Meets or Exceeds Expectations<\/p>\n
A theoretical concept\/framework is identified and well analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept\/framework, a suitable one is suggested.<\/p>\n
24.92 to >21.0 pts<\/p>\n
Mostly Meets Expectations<\/p>\n
A theoretical concept\/framework is somewhat identified and analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept\/framework, a potential concept\/framework is suggested, but it is somewhat inappropriate.<\/p>\n
21 to >16.52 pts<\/p>\n
Below Expectations<\/p>\n
A theoretical concept\/framework is somewhat identified and analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept\/framework, a potential concept\/framework is suggested, is not identified or is grossly inappropriate.<\/p>\n
16.52 to >0 pts<\/p>\n
Does Not Meet Expectations<\/p>\n
A theoretical concept\/framework is misidentified or not analyzed for appropriateness.<\/p>\n
28 pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVariables, Hypotheses, Questions, and Assumptions<\/p>\n
14 to >12.46 pts<\/p>\n
Meets or Exceeds Expectations<\/p>\n
IV and DV are identified and defined. Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion on measurability is included. Research question and hypothesis are identified.<\/p>\n
12.46 to >10.5 pts<\/p>\n
Mostly Meets Expectations<\/p>\n
IV and DV are somewhat identified and or partially defined. Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion on measurability is somewhat included. Research question and hypothesis are partially identified.<\/p>\n
10.5 to >8.26 pts<\/p>\n
Below Expectations<\/p>\n
IV and DV identification and definition are absent or severely lacking. Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion on measurability is absent or inaccurate. Research question and hypothesis are not identified or grossly misidentified.<\/p>\n
8.26 to >0 pts<\/p>\n
Does Not Meet Expectations<\/p>\n
IV and DV identification and definition are absent. Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion on measurability is absent. Research question and hypothesis are not identified.<\/p>\n
14 pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodology<\/p>\n
56 to >49.84 pts<\/p>\n
Meets or Exceeds Expectations<\/p>\n
Type of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are properly identified. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are discussed.<\/p>\n
49.84 to >42.0 pts<\/p>\n
Mostly Meets Expectations<\/p>\n
Type of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are somewhat identified. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are discussed, but some information is inaccurate.<\/p>\n
42 to >33.04 pts<\/p>\n
Below Expectations<\/p>\n
Type of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are absent or misidentified. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are either absent or grossly inaccurate.<\/p>\n
33.04 to >0 pts<\/p>\n
Does Not Meet Expectations<\/p>\n
Type of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are absent. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are absent.<\/p>\n
56 pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Analysis<\/p>\n
42 to >37.38 pts<\/p>\n
Meets or Exceeds Expectations<\/p>\n
Data analysis tool is identified. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is included and accurate. At least one finding is appropriately identified.<\/p>\n
37.38 to >31.5 pts<\/p>\n
Mostly Meets Expectations<\/p>\n
Data analysis tool is somewhat identified. An incomplete explanation on how the results are presented in the study is included. At least one finding is identified.<\/p>\n
31.5 to >24.78 pts<\/p>\n
Below Expectations<\/p>\n
Data analysis tool is absent or misidentified. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is absent or grossly unclear. Findings are not included or are grossly inaccurate.<\/p>\n
24.78 to >0 pts<\/p>\n
Does Not Meet Expectations<\/p>\n
Data analysis tool is absent. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is absent. Findings are not included.<\/p>\n
42 pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHomework help – Summary, Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations<\/p>\n
56 to >49.84 pts<\/p>\n
Meets or Exceeds Expectations<\/p>\n
Strengths and limitations of the study are identified. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is included. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing is included and appropriate.<\/p>\n
49.84 to >42.0 pts<\/p>\n
Mostly Meets Expectations<\/p>\n
Strengths and limitations of the study are somewhat identified. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is included but may not be fully developed. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing may not be fully developed.<\/p>\n
42 to >33.04 pts<\/p>\n
Below Expectations<\/p>\n
Strengths and limitations of study are absent or lacking. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is absent or lacking. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing is absent or inappropriate.<\/p>\n
33.04 to >0 pts<\/p>\n
Does Not Meet Expectations<\/p>\n
Strengths and limitations of study are absent. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is absent. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing is absent.<\/p>\n
56 pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Ace homework tutors – APA Format<\/p>\n
14 to >12.46 pts<\/p>\n
Meets or Exceeds Expectations<\/p>\n
Written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Responses are mostly error free. Information from sources is appropriately paraphrased and accurately cited.<\/p>\n
12.46 to >10.5 pts<\/p>\n
Mostly Meets Expectations<\/p>\n
Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is correctly paraphrased and cited.<\/p>\n
10.5 to >8.26 pts<\/p>\n
Below Expectations<\/p>\n
Writing is generally unclear and unorganized. Some errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing or improperly cited.<\/p>\n
8.26 to >0 pts<\/p>\n
Does Not Meet Expectations<\/p>\n
Writing is unclear and unorganized. Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing.<\/p>\n
Week 8: Summative Assignment: Research Article Critique<\/p>\n
4\u20136 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page should make up the body of your paper. The critique should be appended to the article and formatted according to Ace homework tutors – APA standards. PLEASE USE THE ARTICLES THAT HAVE BEEN UPLOADED.<\/p>\n
A research criticism exhibits your ability to analyze a research project critically. Choose a nursing-related research article for your task.<\/p>\n
This assignment’s articles cannot be used for any other assignments (students should find new research articles for each new assignment).<\/p>\n
Original research articles should be among the articles chosen. Concept analysis, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, integrative review, and systematic review are not appropriate.<\/p>\n
Mixed-methods research should be avoided.<\/p>\n
Dissertations are not to be used.<\/p>\n
The following should be included in your critique:<\/p>\n
Problem\/Purpose of Research<\/p>\n
Clearly state the problem as it appears in the report.<\/p>\n
Have the researchers framed the research problem in the perspective of previous knowledge?<\/p>\n
Will the study address a nursing-related issue?<\/p>\n
Declare the research’s purpose.<\/p>\n
Examine the Literature<\/p>\n
Identify the themes that were discussed during the literature review.<\/p>\n
Were the references up to date? What do you suppose the causes are if not?<\/p>\n
Was there any evidence of reflexivity (qualitative) in the design?<\/p>\n
Theoretical Foundation<\/p>\n
Is it possible to define and apply theoretical concepts to the research?<\/p>\n
Is the research primarily based on nursing theory, or does it also include theory from other disciplines?<\/p>\n
Is there a theoretical framework in this study paper?<\/p>\n
If not, propose one that would be appropriate for the research.<\/p>\n
Variables\/Hypotheses\/Questions\/Assumptions\/Assumptions\/Assumptions\/Assumptions\/Assumptions\/A (Quantitative)<\/p>\n
What are the study’s independent and dependent variables?<\/p>\n
Is it possible to get the operational definitions of the variables? Are they concrete and measurable, if so?<\/p>\n
Is there a statement of the study question or hypothesis? What exactly is it?<\/p>\n
Research Questions, Conceptual Underpinnings (Qualitative)<\/p>\n
Are crucial notions cognitively defined?<\/p>\n
Is the philosophical foundation, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideological orientation made plain, and is it relevant to the problem?<\/p>\n
Are the research questions presented clearly? Is the study’s philosophical foundation, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideological orientation consistent with the questions?<\/p>\n
Methodology<\/p>\n
In this study, what type of design (quantitative, qualitative, and type) was used?<\/p>\n
Was this study based on inductive or deductive reasoning?<\/p>\n
State the sample size and population of the study, as well as the sampling process and study location.<\/p>\n
Is it a probability or non-probability sample that the investigator used?<\/p>\n
Describe the measurement tools’ level of reliability and validity (quantitative only)<\/p>\n
Qualitative research (except from the last bulleted item, answer the following questions in addition to the ones listed above)<\/p>\n
Were the data collection procedures appropriate?<\/p>\n
To accomplish triangulation, were data collected using two or more methods?<\/p>\n
Is it possible that the researcher asked the right questions or made the right observations, and that they were documented properly?<\/p>\n
Was there enough information gathered?<\/p>\n
Was there enough depth and variety in the data?<\/p>\n
Were ethical considerations taken into account? Were proper safeguards in place to protect the rights of research participants?<\/p>\n
Analyze the data<\/p>\n
What kind of data analysis software was used?<\/p>\n
Was it possible to reach saturation? (qualitative)<\/p>\n
How were the study’s findings presented?<\/p>\n
Were the methodologies for data management (e.g., coding) and data analysis adequately described? (qualitative)<\/p>\n
At least one (1) finding should be identified.<\/p>\n
Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations Homework help – Summary\/Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations<\/p>\n
Do the themes effectively capture the data’s meaning?<\/p>\n
Is the picture of the phenomenon under examination intelligent, intriguing, and meaningful as a result of the analysis?<\/p>\n
Were procedures utilized to improve the data’s (and analysis’) reliability, and was the description of those approaches adequate?<\/p>\n
Do the boundaries\/limitations have a clear explanation, a detailed description, and an audit trail?<\/p>\n
What are the study’s advantages and disadvantages?<\/p>\n
Is it possible for the researcher to extrapolate the findings to other populations? Explain.<\/p>\n
Assess the significance of the findings and implications for nursing (both qualitative and quantitative).<\/p>\n
4\u20136 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page should make up the body of your paper. The critique should be appended to the article and formatted according to Ace homework tutors – APA standards.<\/p>\n
Do you require Ace homework tutors – APA assistance?<\/p>\n
Along with your assignment, you must send the research study articles.<\/p>\n
For more information on how your assignment will be judged, look over the rubric.<\/p>\n
Rubric<\/p>\n
NURS 350 OL – NURS350-Research Critique NURS 350 OL – NURS350-Research Critique<\/p>\n
NURS 350 OL – NURS350-Research Critique NURS 350 OL – NURS350-Research Critique<\/p>\n
Criteria<\/p>\n
Ratings<\/p>\n
Pts<\/p>\n
This criterion has a Learning OutcomeResearch Problem\/Purpose attached to it.<\/p>\n
28.92 pts to >24.92 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations are met or exceeded<\/p>\n
The research problem, purpose, and relevance to nursing are all well stated.<\/p>\n
>21.0 pts 24.92 pts 24.92 pts 24.92 pts 24<\/p>\n
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations<\/p>\n
The research problem, the objective of the research, and the relation to nursing are all identified to some extent.<\/p>\n
>16.52 pts to 21 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations were not met.<\/p>\n
The research challenge, the objective of the research, and the relevance of the research to nursing are frequently missing or misrepresented.<\/p>\n
16.52 points. to 0 pts.<\/p>\n
Expectations aren’t met<\/p>\n
The research problem, purpose, and relevance to nursing are all missing.<\/p>\n
28 points<\/p>\n
This criterion is tied to a Review of the Literature Learning Outcome.<\/p>\n
42.38 pts to >37.38 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations are met or exceeded<\/p>\n
The literature review’s key concepts are clearly stated. Reference criticism is included and effectively developed.<\/p>\n
37.38 points. to 31.5 pts.<\/p>\n
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations<\/p>\n
The literature review’s concepts have been identified to some extent. Reference criticism is included, but it may not be fully developed.<\/p>\n
>24.78 pts 31.5 pts 31.5 pts 31.5 pts 31.5<\/p>\n
Expectations were not met.<\/p>\n
The literature review’s concepts are incorrectly identified. Reference criticism is woefully weak.<\/p>\n
24.78 points. to 0 pts.<\/p>\n
Expectations aren’t met<\/p>\n
There are no concepts discussed in the literature review. The allusions are not questioned.<\/p>\n
42 points<\/p>\n
This criterion is tied to a Theoretical Framework for Learning Outcomes.<\/p>\n
28.92 pts to >24.92 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations are met or exceeded<\/p>\n
A theoretical concept\/framework is identified and thoroughly examined for suitability. A suitable concept\/framework is recommended if the article lacks one.<\/p>\n
>21.0 pts 24.92 pts 24.92 pts 24.92 pts 24<\/p>\n
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations<\/p>\n
A theoretical concept\/framework is identified and evaluated for suitability. A potential concept\/framework is suggested if the article lacks one, however it is slightly inappropriate.<\/p>\n
>16.52 pts to 21 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations were not met.<\/p>\n
A theoretical concept\/framework is identified and evaluated for suitability. If the article is missing a concept\/framework, a prospective concept\/framework is proposed but not identified, or the concept\/framework is wildly incorrect.<\/p>\n
16.52 points. to 0 pts.<\/p>\n
Expectations aren’t met<\/p>\n
A theoretical concept or framework is misidentified or not properly evaluated.<\/p>\n
28 points<\/p>\n
Variables, Hypotheses, Questions, and Assumptions are all linked to a Learning Outcome.<\/p>\n
14.46 pts to >14.46 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations are met or exceeded<\/p>\n
The IV and DV syndromes are recognized and defined. There is also a discussion of measurability. The research topic as well as the hypothesis have been identified.<\/p>\n
12.46 points. to 10.5 pts.<\/p>\n
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations<\/p>\n
IV and DV have been identified and\/or characterized to some extent. Measurability is discussed in some detail. The research question and hypothesis have been identified in part.<\/p>\n
>8.26 pts 10.5 pts 10.5 pts 10.5 pts 10.5<\/p>\n
Expectations were not met.<\/p>\n
Identification and definition of IV and DV are either missing or significantly deficient. Measurability is either ignored or misunderstood. The research topic and hypothesis are either not identified or are drastically incorrectly identified.<\/p>\n
8.26 points. to 0 pts.<\/p>\n
Expectations aren’t met<\/p>\n
I, IV, and DV The terms “identification” and “definition” aren’t used. There is no mention of measurability. There is no mention of a research question or hypothesis.<\/p>\n
14 points<\/p>\n
This criterion has a Learning OutcomeMethodology attached to it.<\/p>\n
56.84 pts to >49.84 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations are met or exceeded<\/p>\n
The design type, sample size, study population, sampling method, and reasoning process are all correctly identified. The topics of measurement tool reliability and validity, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are examined.<\/p>\n
>42.0 pts 49.84 pts 49.84 pts 49.84 pts 49<\/p>\n
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations<\/p>\n
The type of design, sample size, study population, sampling process, and reasoning approach are all identified to some extent. Some information is incorrect, including measurement tool reliability and validity, ethical implications, and probability vs. non-probability sampling.<\/p>\n
42.04 pts to >33.04 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations were not met.<\/p>\n
The type of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and reasoning process are either missing or incorrectly identified. Ethical considerations, measurement tool reliability and validity, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are all either lacking or severely wrong.<\/p>\n
>0 pts to 33.04 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations aren’t met<\/p>\n
There is no mention of the type of design, sample size, study population, sampling process, or explanation. There is no mention of measurement tool reliability and validity, ethical considerations, or probability vs. non-probability sampling.<\/p>\n
56 points<\/p>\n
This criterion is tied to a Data Analysis of Learning Outcomes.<\/p>\n
42.38 pts to >37.38 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations are met or exceeded<\/p>\n
A tool for data analysis has been identified. An explanation of how the study’s findings are presented is included, and it is correct. At least one finding has been identified correctly.<\/p>\n
37.38 points. to 31.5 pts.<\/p>\n
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations<\/p>\n
A data analysis tool has been identified to some extent. There is an insufficient description of how the study’s findings are presented. At least one discovery has been made.<\/p>\n
>24.78 pts 31.5 pts 31.5 pts 31.5 pts 31.5<\/p>\n
Expectations were not met.<\/p>\n
The data analysis tool is missing or incorrectly identified. An explanation of how the study’s findings are presented is either missing or extremely ambiguous. Findings are either missing or highly misleading.<\/p>\n
24.78 points. to 0 pts.<\/p>\n
Expectations aren’t met<\/p>\n
There is no data analysis tool. There is no explanation of how the study’s findings are presented. The results aren’t included.<\/p>\n
42 points<\/p>\n
Homework help – Summary, Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations are all tied to this criterion.<\/p>\n
56.84 pts to >49.84 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations are met or exceeded<\/p>\n
The study’s strengths and weaknesses are identified. There is also a discussion of whether the findings can be generalized. An proper evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and relevance to nursing is included.<\/p>\n
>42.0 pts 49.84 pts 49.84 pts 49.84 pts 49<\/p>\n
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations<\/p>\n
The study’s strengths and weaknesses have been identified to some extent. There is a dispute on whether the study can be generalized, but it may not be fully developed. An assessment of the results, conclusions, and relevance to nursing may not be completed.<\/p>\n
42.04 pts to >33.04 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations were not met.<\/p>\n
The study’s strengths and weaknesses are missing or non-existent. There is no discussion of whether or not the study can be generalized. There is no or insufficient evaluation of the data, conclusions, and relevance to nursing.<\/p>\n
>0 pts to 33.04 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations aren’t met<\/p>\n
The study’s strengths and shortcomings aren’t mentioned. There is no discussion of whether the findings can be generalized. There is no assessment of the findings, conclusions, or relevance to nursing.<\/p>\n
56 points<\/p>\n
This criterion is tied to a Mechanics and Ace homework tutors – APA Format Learning Outcome.<\/p>\n
14.46 pts to >14.46 pts<\/p>\n
Expectations are met or exceeded<\/p>\n
Written in a manner that is clear, concise, formal, and well-organized. The majority of the responses are error-free. The information from sources is paraphrased and cited correctly.<\/p>\n
12.46 points. to 10.5 pts.<\/p>\n
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations<\/p>\n
The writing is generally straightforward and ordered, however the language is neither succinct or formal. Multiple spelling and grammar problems occur, causing moderate readability and comprehension issues. The majority of content is appropriately paraphrased and cited from sources.<\/p>\n
>8.26 pts 10.5 pts 10.5 pts 10.5 pts 10.5<\/p>\n
Expectations were not met.<\/p>\n
In general, writing is illegible and disorganized. Readability and comprehension are harmed by some spelling and grammar problems. Sources aren’t cited correctly or aren’t cited at all.<\/p>\n
8.26 points. to 0 pts.<\/p>\n
Expectations aren’t met<\/p>\n
The writing is disorganized and vague. Readability and comprehension are harmed by spelling and grammar errors. There are no sources available.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Week 8: Summative Assignment: Critique of Research Article The body of your paper should be 4\u20136 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page. The critique…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2468,274,2469,53,2471,354,2470,2467],"tags":[2472,1427,1656,1648,2473,2386,1966],"class_list":["post-6386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bsn-papers","category-dnp-assignment","category-health-care-essays","category-masters-essays","category-nursing-assessment","category-nursing-assignment","category-nursing-homework","category-nursing-papers-homework-help","tag-healthcare-dissertations","tag-healthcare-essays","tag-medical-papers","tag-medical-research-papers","tag-msn-essays","tag-nursing-case-study","tag-nursing-essays"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6386","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6386"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6386\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}