{"id":67766,"date":"2020-11-03T06:37:00","date_gmt":"2020-11-03T06:37:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.essaybishops.com\/dissertations\/?p=67766"},"modified":"2025-11-03T06:42:30","modified_gmt":"2025-11-03T06:42:30","slug":"nursing-interventions-for-acute-heart-failure-exacerbation-in-elderly-patients","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/assessments\/nursing-interventions-for-acute-heart-failure-exacerbation-in-elderly-patients\/","title":{"rendered":"Nursing Interventions for Acute Heart Failure Exacerbation in Elderly Patients"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 dir=\"auto\">Assessment Task 3: Extended Clinical Reasoning Case Study \u2013 Medical-Surgical Nursing<\/h3>\n<p dir=\"auto\"><strong>Unit Code:<\/strong> NRSG378 <strong>Unit Title:<\/strong> Principles of Nursing: Extended Clinical Reasoning <strong>Assessment Type:<\/strong> Individual Written Case Study <strong>Word Limit:<\/strong> 2,000 words (\u00b110%) <strong>Weighting:<\/strong> 50% <strong>Due Date:<\/strong> Wednesday, 4 June 2025, 2:00 pm AEST via Turnitin on LEO <strong>Learning Outcomes Assessed:<\/strong> LO1: Critically analyse complex clinical scenarios using extended reasoning frameworks; LO2: Integrate pathophysiological, pharmacological, and psychosocial data into care planning; LO3: Prioritise ethical and evidence-based interventions for acutely unwell patients; LO4: Evaluate care outcomes and reflect on professional development; LO5: Demonstrate person-centred communication in multidisciplinary contexts.<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"auto\">Task Overview<\/h4>\n<p dir=\"auto\">Apply the Clinical Reasoning Cycle (Levett-Jones, 2018) to an acute medical-surgical case involving decompensated heart failure. Demonstrate extended reasoning by linking assessment data to pathophysiology, prioritising three nursing issues, and justifying interventions with ethical, legal, and evidence-based rationale. This task builds on prior units, focusing on the holistic impact of acute illness. Select if aligned with your placement; consult LIC if unallocated by Week 5. Avoid repeating prior cases.<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"auto\">Case Scenario: Mr. Reginald Harris \u2013 Acute Exacerbation of Congestive Heart Failure<\/h4>\n<p dir=\"auto\">Mr. Reginald Harris, 72-year-old widower, admitted to the medical ward via ED with acute decompensated heart failure (CHF). Presented with 48-hour history of increasing dyspnoea on minimal exertion, orthopnoea, and bilateral leg swelling after non-compliance with fluid restriction and missing diuretic doses. Lives alone; limited mobility due to osteoarthritis.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"auto\"><strong>Past Medical History:<\/strong> Diagnosed CHF (ejection fraction 35%) five years ago; hypertension; type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 8.2%); ex-smoker (30 pack-years); BMI 28. Takes frusemide 40mg BD, ramipril 5mg daily, metoprolol 50mg BD, metformin 1g BD. Recent weight gain 4kg in one week.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"auto\"><strong>Current Presentation (Day 1 Admission):<\/strong> Short of breath at rest, anxious, reports &#8220;can&#8217;t catch breath.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p dir=\"auto\"><strong>Assessment Findings:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul dir=\"auto\">\n<li>Vital signs: Temp 37.2\u00b0C, RR 28\/min (laboured), HR 110 bpm (irregular), SpO2 88% on 6L\/min O2 via mask, BP 160\/95 mmHg, Pain 4\/10 (chest tightness), GCS 15\/15.<\/li>\n<li>Physical: Pale, cool peripheries; bilateral crackles to mid-lung fields; 3+ pitting oedema to knees; JVP elevated 5cm; weight 85kg (baseline 81kg); dry mouth, urine output 20mL\/hr via IDC.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p dir=\"auto\"><strong>Investigations:<\/strong> BNP 1,200 pg\/mL (elevated); Na 128 mmol\/L, K 3.2 mmol\/L; ECG: AF with rate 110; CXR: pulmonary oedema; Echo: EF 32%.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"auto\"><strong>Nursing Notes:<\/strong> IV cannula 20G left forearm; NBM for 4 hours pending GTN infusion; family visited, concerned about discharge planning; non-compliant with low-sodium diet per wife.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"auto\">You are the Registered Nurse coordinating care.<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"auto\">Task Requirements<\/h4>\n<p dir=\"auto\">Use the Clinical Reasoning Cycle (Levett-Jones, 2018) to structure analysis. Process cues from scenario, prioritise issues, set goals, implement\/evaluate interventions, and reflect. Incorporate multidisciplinary aspects (e.g., cardiology input) and address social determinants (e.g., isolation).<\/p>\n<p dir=\"auto\"><strong>Required Sections:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol dir=\"auto\">\n<li><strong>Introduction (200 words):<\/strong> Introduce scenario, framework, and overview of key issues (e.g., fluid overload, electrolyte imbalance, anxiety).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Consider the Patient&#8217;s Situation (250 words):<\/strong> Detail history, admission context, and biopsychosocial factors (e.g., non-adherence, grief).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Collect, Process, and Present Cues (300 words):<\/strong> Organise subjective\/objective data; highlight abnormalities (e.g., hyponatraemia, AF). Link to pathophysiology.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Process Information and Identify Three Nursing Issues (350 words):<\/strong> Prioritise based on ABCs\/Maslow (e.g., impaired gas exchange, excess fluid volume, ineffective health management); justify with NMBA competencies.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Establish Goals (200 words):<\/strong> Develop SMART goals for each issue (e.g., SpO2 &gt;92% within 6 hours).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Take Action \u2013 Nursing Interventions (500 words):<\/strong> Detail 2\u20133 evidence-based strategies per issue (e.g., oxygen titration, fluid monitoring, education); rationalise priority, link to data\/history, address ethical\/legal elements (e.g., capacity for consent).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Evaluate Outcomes (100 words):<\/strong> Assess intervention impact; propose adjustments.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reflect on the Process (100 words):<\/strong> Analyse reasoning gaps; discuss learning for future practice.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p dir=\"auto\">Use 12+ peer-reviewed sources (2019\u20132025); Harvard referencing. Ensure person-centred language.<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"auto\">Rubric Criteria<\/h4>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">\n<div><\/div>\n<table dir=\"auto\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th data-col-size=\"lg\">Criterion<\/th>\n<th data-col-size=\"xl\">High Distinction (85\u2013100%)<\/th>\n<th data-col-size=\"lg\">Distinction (75\u201384%)<\/th>\n<th data-col-size=\"lg\">Credit (65\u201374%)<\/th>\n<th data-col-size=\"md\">Pass (50\u201364%)<\/th>\n<th data-col-size=\"sm\">Fail (&lt;50%)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\"><strong>Extended CRC Application<\/strong> (30%)<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"xl\">Seamless integration; deep pathophysiological\/psychosocial links.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\">Strong framework use; minor linkages.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\">Adequate structure; some depth.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"md\">Basic cycle; fragmented.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"sm\">Framework misused.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\"><strong>Issue Prioritisation<\/strong> (20%)<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"xl\">Three issues expertly prioritised with robust evidence.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\">Clear priorities; solid rationale.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\">Issues relevant; partial evidence.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"md\">Issues identified; weak links.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"sm\">Issues irrelevant.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\"><strong>Interventions &amp; Rationale<\/strong> (25%)<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"xl\">Innovative, ethical interventions; data-driven justification.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\">Evidence-based; good links.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\">Relevant actions; descriptive.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"md\">Basic interventions; limited rationale.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"sm\">Unsafe or unsupported.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\"><strong>Evaluation &amp; Reflection<\/strong> (15%)<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"xl\">Insightful outcomes analysis; profound practice implications.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\">Sound evaluation; reflective.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\">Basic evaluation; surface reflection.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"md\">Minimal analysis.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"sm\">Absent.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\"><strong>Scholarship &amp; Structure<\/strong> (10%)<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"xl\">Exemplary writing; flawless Harvard.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\">Coherent; few errors.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"lg\">Clear; some issues.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"md\">Readable; errors.<\/td>\n<td data-col-size=\"sm\">Disorganised; poor sources.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h4 dir=\"auto\">Submission Instructions<\/h4>\n<p dir=\"auto\">Label: &#8220;StudentID_NRSG378_Ass3_CaseStudy.docx&#8221;. Upload to LEO Turnitin. Late: 10%\/day. Integrity: &lt;15% similarity. Extensions: 48 hours prior with evidence. Q&amp;A recording on LEO Week 9.<\/p>\n<h3 dir=\"auto\">Learning Materials\/Resources<\/h3>\n<p dir=\"auto\">Longhini, J., Gauthier, K., Konradsen, H., Palese, A., Kabir, Z. N. and Waldr\u00e9us, N. (2025) The effectiveness of nursing interventions to improve self-care for patients with heart failure at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <em>BMC Nursing<\/em>, 24(286). doi:10.1186\/s12912-025-02867-7.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"auto\">Yu, S., Wei, D. and Shi, N. (2023) Comprehensive nursing intervention improves quality of life and reduces hospitalization time and expense in elderly patients with severe heart failure undergoing rh-BNP treatment. <em>American Journal of Translational Research<\/em>, 15(8), pp.5239\u20135248.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"auto\">Ord\u00f3\u00f1ez-Piedra, J., Ponce-Bland\u00f3n, J. A., Robles-Romero, J. M., G\u00f3mez-Salgado, J., Jim\u00e9nez-Pic\u00f3n, N. and Romero-Mart\u00edn, M. (2021) Effectiveness of the Advanced Practice Nursing interventions in the patient with heart failure: a systematic review. <em>Nursing Open<\/em>, 8(4), pp.1879\u20131891. doi:10.1002\/nop2.847.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"auto\">Marques, C. R. d. G. et al. (2022) Educational nursing intervention in reducing hospital readmission and the mortality of patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <em>Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease<\/em>, 9(12), p.420. doi:10.3390\/jcdd9120420.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Assessment Task 3: Extended Clinical Reasoning Case Study \u2013 Medical-Surgical Nursing Unit Code: NRSG378 Unit Title: Principles of Nursing: Extended Clinical Reasoning Assessment Type: Individual Written Case Study [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8336],"tags":[8547,8734,8737,8733],"class_list":["post-67766","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research-essay-service-superior-essay-writers","tag-superior-paper-writer-students-sweet-study-bay-resources","tag-psychosocial-support-in-acute-cardiac-exacerbations","tag-extended-reasoning-in-decompensated-chf-management","tag-evidence-based-nursing-for-fluid-overload-in-hf"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/assessments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67766","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/assessments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/assessments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/assessments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/assessments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67766"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/assessments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67766\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":67767,"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/assessments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67766\/revisions\/67767"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/assessments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67766"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/assessments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67766"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.homeworkacetutors.com\/assessments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}